前田氏（及び当職担当被疑者）に犯罪の疑いがないことの理由（事情）として把握したこと――その（２）――
脅されたとされる４人が役員を務める愛三協和協同組合（旧愛知県東部街商協同組合）は、令和７年１月１７日付で、当職担当被疑者を被告とする損害賠償請求訴訟（民事訴訟）を名古屋地方裁判所に提起済みであり、犯行日とされる令和７年７月９日の時点においても、同訴訟が係属中であった（名古屋地方裁判所令和７年（ワ）第１７４号）という客観的事実が存在します。
そうすると、当職担当被疑者は、自身を被告とする民事訴訟が係属中であるにもかかわらず、同訴訟の原告である愛三協和協同組合の役員４人（脅されたとされる４人）から現金を脅し取ろうとしたということになり、警察の見立て（恐喝未遂事件）は、通常では考えにくい不自然な経緯をたどるものとなっています。
X（旧Twitter）・Instagram・TikTok 始めました
アカウント名 AttorneyMINORU
2026.4.16 Conflict with Aichi Prefectural Police ④
Reasons (circumstances) that we have determined there is no suspicion of a crime against Mr. Maeda (and the suspects in our case) — Part (2) —
The Aisan Kyowa Cooperative Association (formerly the Aichi prefecture Tobu Gaisho Cooperative Association), whose executives include the four individuals who were allegedly threatened, had already filed a civil damages lawsuit against the suspect under my charge on January 17, 2025 in the Nagoya District Court. As an objective fact, this lawsuit was still pending as of July 9, 2025—the date on which the alleged offense is said to have occurred (Nagoya District Court Case No. 2025 (Wa) 174). Given this, it would mean that the suspect under my charge attempted to extort money from the four executives of the Aisan Kyowa Cooperative Association—who were plaintiffs in a civil lawsuit against him—while that very lawsuit was ongoing. Such a sequence of events is highly improbable and objectively unnatural.
